Japan vs Kyrgyzstan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Japan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 33.96 kg/ha against 33.36 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.6 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 50th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38.26 kg/ha | 32.35 kg/ha | 5.91 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 35.31 kg/ha | 36.57 kg/ha | 1.25 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 33.44 kg/ha | 34.9 kg/ha | 1.46 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 34.43 kg/ha | 34.61 kg/ha | 0.1749 kg/ha | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Japan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Japan, at 33.96 kg/ha against 33.36 kg/ha in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Japan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6 kg/ha, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Japan ranks 50th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).