Kazakhstan vs Mauritius: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 17.4 kg/ha against 17.04 kg/ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0.36 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 96th and Mauritius ranks 97th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.45 kg/ha | 15.38 kg/ha | 0.9293 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 17.76 kg/ha | 16.36 kg/ha | 1.4 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 18.66 kg/ha | 17.08 kg/ha | 1.58 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 19.37 kg/ha | 15.41 kg/ha | 3.96 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Kazakhstan or Mauritius?
- Kazakhstan, at 17.4 kg/ha against 17.04 kg/ha in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
- 0.36 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mauritius rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 96th and Mauritius ranks 97th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).