Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
23.49 kg/ha
in 2023
Poland
59.1 kg/ha
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
19th
Poland rank
20th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Poland
102030405060196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 59.1 kg/ha against 23.49 kg/ha in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 35.61 kg/ha.

That makes Poland's figure about 2.5 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th and Poland ranks 20th of 32 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 13.11 kg/ha 39.6 kg/ha 26.5 kg/ha Poland
1970s 15.85 kg/ha 48.13 kg/ha 32.28 kg/ha Poland
1980s 17.21 kg/ha 52.61 kg/ha 35.4 kg/ha Poland
1990s 16.21 kg/ha 49.67 kg/ha 33.46 kg/ha Poland
2000s 18.37 kg/ha 46.07 kg/ha 27.71 kg/ha Poland
2010s 21.46 kg/ha 49.71 kg/ha 28.25 kg/ha Poland
2020s 23.69 kg/ha 58.78 kg/ha 35.09 kg/ha Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Poland?
Poland, at 59.1 kg/ha against 23.49 kg/ha in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland?
35.61 kg/ha, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th and Poland ranks 20th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).