Latvia vs Morocco: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Morocco
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 25.01 kg/ha against 23.64 kg/ha in Morocco, a difference of 1.37 kg/ha.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 75th and Morocco ranks 78th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.29 kg/ha | 18.08 kg/ha | 13.21 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 21.28 kg/ha | 20.56 kg/ha | 0.7212 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 18.52 kg/ha | 26.93 kg/ha | 8.41 kg/ha | Morocco |
| 2020s | 27.58 kg/ha | 22.94 kg/ha | 4.65 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Latvia or Morocco?
- Latvia, at 25.01 kg/ha against 23.64 kg/ha in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Latvia and Morocco?
- 1.37 kg/ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Morocco?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Morocco rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 75th and Morocco ranks 78th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).