Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
21.34 kg/ha
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
21.3 kg/ha
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 21.34 kg/ha against 21.3 kg/ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 groups.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 10.39 kg/ha 7.22 kg/ha 3.17 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 11.01 kg/ha 8.07 kg/ha 2.94 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 12.97 kg/ha 10.68 kg/ha 2.29 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 13.39 kg/ha 11.28 kg/ha 2.12 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 15.66 kg/ha 11.98 kg/ha 3.68 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 18.68 kg/ha 15.4 kg/ha 3.27 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 21.02 kg/ha 20.19 kg/ha 0.8396 kg/ha Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or United Republic of Tanzania?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 21.34 kg/ha against 21.3 kg/ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.04 kg/ha, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 18 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/least-developed-countries-ldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/least-developed-countries-ldcs/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).