Lesotho vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lesotho
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 9.92 kg/ha against 9.29 kg/ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0.63 kg/ha.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Lesotho ranks 131st and South Sudan ranks 128th of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.39 kg/ha | 8.76 kg/ha | 0.3655 kg/ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 8.53 kg/ha | 9.3 kg/ha | 0.7705 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Lesotho or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 9.92 kg/ha against 9.29 kg/ha in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Lesotho and South Sudan?
- 0.63 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lesotho ranks 131st and South Sudan ranks 128th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).