Lithuania vs Myanmar: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Myanmar
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 35.84 kg/ha against 34.86 kg/ha in Myanmar, a difference of 0.98 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Myanmar ahead.
Lithuania ranks 50th and Myanmar ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.17 kg/ha | 22.56 kg/ha | 5.39 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 22.96 kg/ha | 26.11 kg/ha | 3.15 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 30.95 kg/ha | 30.2 kg/ha | 0.743 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 36.61 kg/ha | 34.13 kg/ha | 2.47 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Lithuania or Myanmar?
- Lithuania, at 35.84 kg/ha against 34.86 kg/ha in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Lithuania and Myanmar?
- 0.98 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Myanmar?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Myanmar rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 50th and Myanmar ranks 51st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).