Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
20.58 kg/ha
in 2023
Pakistan
57.6 kg/ha
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
20th
Pakistan rank
21st

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Pakistan
102030405060196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 57.6 kg/ha against 20.58 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 37.02 kg/ha.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 2.8 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 20th and Pakistan ranks 21st of 29 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 11.21 kg/ha 13.62 kg/ha 2.4 kg/ha Pakistan
1970s 12.16 kg/ha 19.29 kg/ha 7.14 kg/ha Pakistan
1980s 13.53 kg/ha 24.93 kg/ha 11.41 kg/ha Pakistan
1990s 14.16 kg/ha 30.21 kg/ha 16.05 kg/ha Pakistan
2000s 15.93 kg/ha 35.12 kg/ha 19.19 kg/ha Pakistan
2010s 18.14 kg/ha 43.35 kg/ha 25.21 kg/ha Pakistan
2020s 20.16 kg/ha 53.09 kg/ha 32.92 kg/ha Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 57.6 kg/ha against 20.58 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
37.02 kg/ha, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 20th and Pakistan ranks 21st of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).