Malawi vs Serbia: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Malawi
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 20.09 kg/ha against 19.96 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 0.13 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Malawi ranks 88th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.18 kg/ha | 20.59 kg/ha | 6.41 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 16.47 kg/ha | 22.73 kg/ha | 6.25 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 20.27 kg/ha | 20.25 kg/ha | 0.0254 kg/ha | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Malawi or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 20.09 kg/ha against 19.96 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Malawi and Serbia?
- 0.13 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Serbia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Malawi ranks 88th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).