Mali vs Peru: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Mali
- Peru
How they compare
Mali currently reports 29.48 kg/ha against 28.37 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 1.11 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Mali ranks 62nd and Peru ranks 65th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 6 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.24 kg/ha | 16.06 kg/ha | 1.83 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 15.63 kg/ha | 15.41 kg/ha | 0.2211 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 17.44 kg/ha | 16 kg/ha | 1.44 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 18.77 kg/ha | 16.85 kg/ha | 1.92 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 22.31 kg/ha | 20.75 kg/ha | 1.56 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 28.16 kg/ha | 24.77 kg/ha | 3.39 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 28.88 kg/ha | 27.94 kg/ha | 0.9447 kg/ha | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Mali or Peru?
- Mali, at 29.48 kg/ha against 28.37 kg/ha in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Mali and Peru?
- 1.11 kg/ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Peru rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Mali ranks 62nd and Peru ranks 65th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).