Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Ukraine: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
25.12 kg/ha
in 2023
Ukraine
69.8 kg/ha
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
14th
Ukraine rank
12th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Ukraine
20406080196119922023

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 69.8 kg/ha against 25.12 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 44.68 kg/ha.

That makes Ukraine's figure about 2.8 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 14th and Ukraine ranks 12th of 29 groups.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 16.61 kg/ha 38.15 kg/ha 21.54 kg/ha Ukraine
2000s 19.13 kg/ha 39.74 kg/ha 20.62 kg/ha Ukraine
2010s 22.11 kg/ha 56.04 kg/ha 33.93 kg/ha Ukraine
2020s 24.5 kg/ha 65.06 kg/ha 40.57 kg/ha Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 69.8 kg/ha against 25.12 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Ukraine?
44.68 kg/ha, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Ukraine rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 14th and Ukraine ranks 12th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Ukraine: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/ukraine/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Ukraine: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).