Papua New Guinea vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Papua New Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 9.92 kg/ha against 9.64 kg/ha in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.28 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 130th and South Sudan ranks 128th of 186 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.67 kg/ha | 8.76 kg/ha | 1.91 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 10.09 kg/ha | 9.3 kg/ha | 0.7866 kg/ha | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Papua New Guinea or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 9.92 kg/ha against 9.64 kg/ha in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Papua New Guinea and South Sudan?
- 0.28 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 130th and South Sudan ranks 128th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).