Peru vs Rwanda: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Peru
- Rwanda
How they compare
Peru currently reports 28.37 kg/ha against 28.31 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.06 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Peru ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.06 kg/ha | 36.37 kg/ha | 20.3 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 15.41 kg/ha | 36.17 kg/ha | 20.77 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 16 kg/ha | 35.44 kg/ha | 19.44 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 16.85 kg/ha | 31.4 kg/ha | 14.55 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 20.75 kg/ha | 28.58 kg/ha | 7.83 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 24.77 kg/ha | 28.04 kg/ha | 3.28 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 27.94 kg/ha | 27.41 kg/ha | 0.5295 kg/ha | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Peru or Rwanda?
- Peru, at 28.37 kg/ha against 28.31 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Peru and Rwanda?
- 0.06 kg/ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Rwanda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Peru ranks 69th and Rwanda ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).