Tajikistan vs Ukraine: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Tajikistan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 69.8 kg/ha against 64.34 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 5.46 kg/ha.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 15th and Ukraine ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29.8 kg/ha | 38.15 kg/ha | 8.34 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 41.34 kg/ha | 39.74 kg/ha | 1.59 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 54.4 kg/ha | 56.04 kg/ha | 1.64 kg/ha | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 62.83 kg/ha | 65.06 kg/ha | 2.23 kg/ha | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area, Tajikistan or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 69.8 kg/ha against 64.34 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area between Tajikistan and Ukraine?
- 5.46 kg/ha, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Tajikistan and Ukraine rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Tajikistan ranks 15th and Ukraine ranks 12th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).