Albania vs Burundi: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Albania
- Burundi
How they compare
Albania currently reports 18,849 t against 16,731 t in Burundi, a difference of 2,118 t.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.
Albania ranks 105th and Burundi ranks 106th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 6 and Burundi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,108 t | 6,204 t | 903.69 t | Albania |
| 1970s | 14,114 t | 9,475 t | 4,639 t | Albania |
| 1980s | 18,406 t | 13,488 t | 4,918 t | Albania |
| 1990s | 14,475 t | 16,759 t | 2,284 t | Burundi |
| 2000s | 16,113 t | 14,795 t | 1,318 t | Albania |
| 2010s | 18,973 t | 14,431 t | 4,542 t | Albania |
| 2020s | 18,812 t | 15,884 t | 2,928 t | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Albania or Burundi?
- Albania, at 18,849 t against 16,731 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Albania and Burundi?
- 2,118 t, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Burundi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Albania and Burundi rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Albania ranks 105th and Burundi ranks 106th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).