Argentina vs Japan: Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Argentina
- Japan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 157,374 t against 145,921 t in Japan, a difference of 11,453 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Argentina ranks 46th and Japan ranks 49th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 250,303 t | 457,690 t | 207,386 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 314,633 t | 453,050 t | 138,417 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 251,409 t | 284,896 t | 33,487 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 168,976 t | 195,097 t | 26,121 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 118,830 t | 166,359 t | 47,529 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 123,611 t | 150,410 t | 26,799 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 196,335 t | 149,292 t | 47,042 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland potassium, Argentina or Japan?
- Argentina, at 157,374 t against 145,921 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland potassium between Argentina and Japan?
- 11,453 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Japan rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland potassium?
- Argentina ranks 46th and Japan ranks 49th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).