Argentina vs Kenya: Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Argentina
- Kenya
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 157,374 t against 148,529 t in Kenya, a difference of 8,845 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 46th and Kenya ranks 48th of 185 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 250,303 t | 45,360 t | 204,943 t | Argentina |
| 1970s | 314,633 t | 52,491 t | 262,142 t | Argentina |
| 1980s | 251,409 t | 72,957 t | 178,453 t | Argentina |
| 1990s | 168,976 t | 80,865 t | 88,111 t | Argentina |
| 2000s | 118,830 t | 85,274 t | 33,557 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 123,611 t | 114,544 t | 9,067 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 196,335 t | 136,017 t | 60,318 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland potassium, Argentina or Kenya?
- Argentina, at 157,374 t against 148,529 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland potassium between Argentina and Kenya?
- 8,845 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Kenya rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland potassium?
- Argentina ranks 46th and Kenya ranks 48th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).