Armenia vs Paraguay: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Armenia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 11,742 t against 11,375 t in Armenia, a difference of 367 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 115th and Paraguay ranks 113th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,986 t | 7,032 t | 1,954 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 11,116 t | 4,846 t | 6,270 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 13,506 t | 6,667 t | 6,839 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 9,762 t | 10,708 t | 945.88 t | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Armenia or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 11,742 t against 11,375 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Armenia and Paraguay?
- 367 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Paraguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Paraguay rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Armenia ranks 115th and Paraguay ranks 113th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).