Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium

Australia and New Zealand
514,647 t
in 2023
Central America
1.16 million t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
18th
Central America rank
20th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Central America
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Central America currently reports 1.16 million t against 514,647 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 643,633 t.

That makes Central America's figure about 2.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Central America has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Central America ranks 20th of 186 countries.

Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Central America Difference Ahead
1960s 89,604 t 278,686 t 189,082 t Central America
1970s 95,404 t 363,716 t 268,312 t Central America
1980s 147,450 t 537,072 t 389,622 t Central America
1990s 184,811 t 678,954 t 494,142 t Central America
2000s 226,769 t 783,945 t 557,176 t Central America
2010s 339,250 t 883,474 t 544,224 t Central America
2020s 428,332 t 1.09 million t 662,788 t Central America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Australia and New Zealand or Central America?
Central America, at 1.16 million t against 514,647 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
643,633 t, with Central America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Central America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Central America rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Central America ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/australia-and-new-zealand/central-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs Central America: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).