Australia vs Kazakhstan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 518,414 t against 498,921 t in Australia, a difference of 19,493 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 17th of 185 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 180,184 t | 488,951 t | 308,767 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 216,538 t | 512,755 t | 296,217 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 326,389 t | 551,632 t | 225,243 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 412,214 t | 576,697 t | 164,482 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Australia or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 518,414 t against 498,921 t in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 19,493 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Australia ranks 20th and Kazakhstan ranks 17th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).