Austria vs Azerbaijan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Austria
- Azerbaijan
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 91,640 t against 88,436 t in Austria, a difference of 3,204 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 72nd and Azerbaijan ranks 71st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Azerbaijan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Azerbaijan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73,610 t | 40,487 t | 33,123 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 73,169 t | 60,638 t | 12,531 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 77,842 t | 69,555 t | 8,287 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 88,315 t | 89,619 t | 1,305 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Austria or Azerbaijan?
- Azerbaijan, at 91,640 t against 88,436 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Austria and Azerbaijan?
- 3,204 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Azerbaijan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Azerbaijan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Austria ranks 72nd and Azerbaijan ranks 71st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).