Austria vs Belgium-Luxembourg: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Austria
- Belgium-Luxembourg
How they compare
Austria currently reports 88,436 t against 86,767 t in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 1,669 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Austria ranks 65th and Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 66th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Belgium-Luxembourg in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belgium-Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 44,344 t | 80,611 t | 36,268 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 58,570 t | 79,424 t | 20,854 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 77,655 t | 68,674 t | 8,981 t | Austria |
| 1990s | 75,438 t | 84,584 t | 9,146 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Austria or Belgium-Luxembourg?
- Austria, at 88,436 t against 86,767 t in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Austria and Belgium-Luxembourg?
- 1,669 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium-Luxembourg?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Austria and Belgium-Luxembourg rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Austria ranks 65th and Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 66th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).