Bahamas vs Barbados: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Bahamas
- Barbados
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 104.11 t against 81.98 t in Bahamas, a difference of 22.13 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Bahamas's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 167th and Barbados ranks 164th of 186 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 84.39 t | 353.47 t | 269.08 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 88.43 t | 282.1 t | 193.67 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 83.7 t | 251.72 t | 168.02 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 51.76 t | 232.65 t | 180.89 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 52.9 t | 202.31 t | 149.41 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 80.46 t | 126.58 t | 46.12 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 81.47 t | 105.99 t | 24.52 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Bahamas or Barbados?
- Barbados, at 104.11 t against 81.98 t in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Bahamas and Barbados?
- 22.13 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Barbados?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Barbados rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Bahamas ranks 167th and Barbados ranks 164th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).