Bahamas, The vs Tonga: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Bahamas, The
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 101.62 t against 81.98 t in Bahamas, The, a difference of 19.64 t.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas, The's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tonga ahead.
Bahamas, The ranks 167th and Tonga ranks 165th of 185 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas, The | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 84.39 t | 172.21 t | 87.82 t | Tonga |
| 1970s | 88.43 t | 151.64 t | 63.21 t | Tonga |
| 1980s | 83.7 t | 129.51 t | 45.81 t | Tonga |
| 1990s | 51.76 t | 99.74 t | 47.98 t | Tonga |
| 2000s | 52.9 t | 73.01 t | 20.11 t | Tonga |
| 2010s | 80.46 t | 89.1 t | 8.64 t | Tonga |
| 2020s | 81.47 t | 102.07 t | 20.61 t | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Bahamas, The or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 101.62 t against 81.98 t in Bahamas, The as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Bahamas, The and Tonga?
- 19.64 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas, The and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas, The and Tonga rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Bahamas, The ranks 167th and Tonga ranks 165th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).