Bangladesh vs Ethiopia: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Bangladesh
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 779,724 t against 735,742 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 43,982 t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 12th and Ethiopia ranks 13th of 186 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 351,390 t | 160,230 t | 191,160 t | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 447,256 t | 236,321 t | 210,935 t | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 581,551 t | 522,788 t | 58,763 t | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 737,859 t | 729,494 t | 8,365 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Bangladesh or Ethiopia?
- Bangladesh, at 779,724 t against 735,742 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Bangladesh and Ethiopia?
- 43,982 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Ethiopia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Bangladesh ranks 12th and Ethiopia ranks 13th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).