Belarus vs Cabo Verde: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 339,033 t against 98.87 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 338,934 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 3,429.0 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 27th and Cabo Verde ranks 29th of 186 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 245,254 t | 114.91 t | 245,139 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 270,140 t | 154.6 t | 269,985 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 316,834 t | 128.98 t | 316,706 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 335,206 t | 97.62 t | 335,108 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Belarus or Cabo Verde?
- Belarus, at 339,033 t against 98.87 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Belarus and Cabo Verde?
- 338,934 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cabo Verde?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Cabo Verde rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 27th and Cabo Verde ranks 29th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).