Belarus vs Italy: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 352,568 t against 339,033 t in Belarus, a difference of 13,535 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Italy ahead.
Belarus ranks 27th and Italy ranks 26th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 245,254 t | 325,656 t | 80,402 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 270,140 t | 299,690 t | 29,550 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 316,834 t | 301,162 t | 15,672 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 335,206 t | 346,498 t | 11,293 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Belarus or Italy?
- Italy, at 352,568 t against 339,033 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Belarus and Italy?
- 13,535 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Italy rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 27th and Italy ranks 26th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).