Belarus vs Northern Europe: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Northern Europe currently reports 774,148 t against 339,033 t in Belarus, a difference of 435,115 t.
That makes Northern Europe's figure about 2.3 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 27th and Northern Europe ranks 24th of 186 countries.
Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 245,254 t | 1.05 million t | 804,317 t | Northern Europe |
| 2000s | 270,140 t | 1.00 million t | 733,919 t | Northern Europe |
| 2010s | 316,834 t | 957,478 t | 640,644 t | Northern Europe |
| 2020s | 335,206 t | 872,352 t | 537,146 t | Northern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Belarus or Northern Europe?
- Northern Europe, at 774,148 t against 339,033 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Belarus and Northern Europe?
- 435,115 t, with Northern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Northern Europe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Northern Europe rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 27th and Northern Europe ranks 24th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).