Belarus vs South Africa: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 390,350 t against 339,033 t in Belarus, a difference of 51,317 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 24th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 245,254 t | 126,605 t | 118,649 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 270,140 t | 150,847 t | 119,293 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 316,834 t | 210,992 t | 105,842 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 335,206 t | 357,659 t | 22,453 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Belarus or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 390,350 t against 339,033 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Belarus and South Africa?
- 51,317 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 24th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).