Belgium-Luxembourg vs Guatemala: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Guatemala
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 86,767 t against 84,083 t in Guatemala, a difference of 2,684 t.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 66th and Guatemala ranks 67th of 186 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 80,611 t | 1,253 t | 79,359 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 79,424 t | 2,377 t | 77,047 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 68,674 t | 5,374 t | 63,299 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 84,584 t | 8,771 t | 75,813 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Belgium-Luxembourg or Guatemala?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 86,767 t against 84,083 t in Guatemala as of 1999.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Belgium-Luxembourg and Guatemala?
- 2,684 t, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Guatemala?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Guatemala rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 66th and Guatemala ranks 67th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).