Belgium vs Saudi Arabia: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 100,461 t against 99,847 t in Belgium, a difference of 614 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Belgium ranks 61st and Saudi Arabia ranks 60th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82,990 t | 133,431 t | 50,441 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 88,274 t | 109,390 t | 21,116 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 96,604 t | 90,763 t | 5,841 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Belgium or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 100,461 t against 99,847 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Belgium and Saudi Arabia?
- 614 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Saudi Arabia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Saudi Arabia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 61st and Saudi Arabia ranks 60th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).