Benin vs Nicaragua: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Benin
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 58,921 t against 55,500 t in Benin, a difference of 3,421 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Benin's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 79th of 186 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,903 t | 28.41 t | 4,875 t | Benin |
| 1970s | 8,294 t | 46.44 t | 8,248 t | Benin |
| 1980s | 11,505 t | 65.51 t | 11,440 t | Benin |
| 1990s | 21,941 t | 149.62 t | 21,792 t | Benin |
| 2000s | 34,926 t | 214.82 t | 34,711 t | Benin |
| 2010s | 47,190 t | 17,741 t | 29,450 t | Benin |
| 2020s | 59,911 t | 50,026 t | 9,885 t | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Benin or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 58,921 t against 55,500 t in Benin as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Benin and Nicaragua?
- 3,421 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Nicaragua?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Nicaragua rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Benin ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 79th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).