Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Congo
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 4,482 t against 4,344 t in Congo, a difference of 138 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 131st and Congo ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,713 t | 3,077 t | 10,636 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 15,067 t | 3,398 t | 11,669 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 14,159 t | 3,939 t | 10,221 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 9,896 t | 4,258 t | 5,638 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Congo?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 4,482 t against 4,344 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
- 138 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 131st and Congo ranks 133rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).