Botswana vs Comoros: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Botswana
- Comoros
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1,619 t against 999.54 t in Comoros, a difference of 619.46 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.6 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 161st and Comoros ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Comoros in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,449 t | 583.95 t | 865.36 t | Botswana |
| 1970s | 1,483 t | 629.87 t | 852.85 t | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1,021 t | 690.15 t | 330.73 t | Botswana |
| 1990s | 860.76 t | 602.03 t | 258.73 t | Botswana |
| 2000s | 740.27 t | 838.99 t | 98.71 t | Comoros |
| 2010s | 1,067 t | 880.56 t | 186.69 t | Botswana |
| 2020s | 1,585 t | 957.6 t | 627.27 t | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Botswana or Comoros?
- Botswana, at 1,619 t against 999.54 t in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Botswana and Comoros?
- 619.46 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Comoros?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Comoros rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Botswana ranks 161st and Comoros ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).