Botswana vs Cyprus: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Botswana
- Cyprus
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 2,023 t against 1,619 t in Botswana, a difference of 404 t.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cyprus ahead.
Botswana ranks 161st and Cyprus ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,449 t | 3,005 t | 1,556 t | Cyprus |
| 1970s | 1,483 t | 1,915 t | 432.38 t | Cyprus |
| 1980s | 1,021 t | 1,905 t | 883.76 t | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 860.76 t | 2,107 t | 1,246 t | Cyprus |
| 2000s | 740.27 t | 1,702 t | 962.19 t | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 1,067 t | 1,546 t | 478.35 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 1,585 t | 2,060 t | 475.28 t | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Botswana or Cyprus?
- Cyprus, at 2,023 t against 1,619 t in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Botswana and Cyprus?
- 404 t, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cyprus?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Cyprus rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Botswana ranks 161st and Cyprus ranks 159th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).