Brazil vs Ethiopia: Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Brazil
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 735,742 t against 629,051 t in Brazil, a difference of 106,691 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 15th and Ethiopia ranks 13th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 269,190 t | 160,230 t | 108,960 t | Brazil |
| 2000s | 265,570 t | 236,321 t | 29,249 t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 362,533 t | 522,788 t | 160,255 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 556,805 t | 729,494 t | 172,689 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland potassium, Brazil or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 735,742 t against 629,051 t in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland potassium between Brazil and Ethiopia?
- 106,691 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Ethiopia rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland potassium?
- Brazil ranks 15th and Ethiopia ranks 13th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).