Brazil vs Poland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Brazil
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 682,413 t against 629,051 t in Brazil, a difference of 53,362 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 15th and Poland ranks 14th of 185 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 124,512 t | 623,406 t | 498,894 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 178,463 t | 727,657 t | 549,194 t | Poland |
| 1980s | 290,489 t | 780,186 t | 489,697 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 269,966 t | 722,734 t | 452,767 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 265,570 t | 597,454 t | 331,884 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 362,533 t | 561,905 t | 199,372 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 556,805 t | 677,130 t | 120,325 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Brazil or Poland?
- Poland, at 682,413 t against 629,051 t in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Brazil and Poland?
- 53,362 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Poland rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Brazil ranks 15th and Poland ranks 14th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).