Burkina Faso vs Ghana: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Burkina Faso
- Ghana
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 134,680 t against 134,604 t in Ghana, a difference of 76 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Ghana ranks 55th of 186 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,965 t | 12,479 t | 4,486 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1970s | 18,701 t | 15,227 t | 3,474 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1980s | 27,167 t | 20,139 t | 7,029 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1990s | 52,681 t | 35,413 t | 17,268 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 91,479 t | 49,890 t | 41,589 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 120,301 t | 85,275 t | 35,026 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 131,258 t | 122,720 t | 8,538 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Burkina Faso or Ghana?
- Burkina Faso, at 134,680 t against 134,604 t in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Burkina Faso and Ghana?
- 76 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ghana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Ghana rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Ghana ranks 55th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).