Burkina Faso vs Slovakia: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Burkina Faso
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 143,677 t against 134,680 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 8,997 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Slovakia ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Slovakia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57,297 t | 104,941 t | 47,644 t | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 91,479 t | 77,347 t | 14,132 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 120,301 t | 96,627 t | 23,674 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 131,258 t | 128,382 t | 2,876 t | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Burkina Faso or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 143,677 t against 134,680 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Burkina Faso and Slovakia?
- 8,997 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Slovakia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Burkina Faso ranks 54th and Slovakia ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).