Burundi vs Costa Rica: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Burundi
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 16,731 t against 16,592 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 139 t.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 106th and Costa Rica ranks 107th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Costa Rica in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,204 t | 5,014 t | 1,190 t | Burundi |
| 1970s | 9,475 t | 9,782 t | 307.45 t | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 13,488 t | 12,610 t | 877.73 t | Burundi |
| 1990s | 16,759 t | 14,764 t | 1,994 t | Burundi |
| 2000s | 14,795 t | 13,553 t | 1,242 t | Burundi |
| 2010s | 14,431 t | 16,409 t | 1,979 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 15,884 t | 16,731 t | 847.17 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Burundi or Costa Rica?
- Burundi, at 16,731 t against 16,592 t in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Burundi and Costa Rica?
- 139 t, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Costa Rica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Costa Rica rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Burundi ranks 106th and Costa Rica ranks 107th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).