Cabo Verde vs Tonga: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Cabo Verde
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 101.62 t against 98.87 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 2.75 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 179th and Tonga ranks 178th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 6 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 180.08 t | 172.21 t | 7.87 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1970s | 171.69 t | 151.64 t | 20.05 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1980s | 159.29 t | 129.51 t | 29.78 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1990s | 114.55 t | 99.74 t | 14.81 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 154.6 t | 73.01 t | 81.6 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 128.98 t | 89.1 t | 39.89 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 97.62 t | 102.07 t | 4.45 t | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 101.62 t against 98.87 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and Tonga?
- 2.75 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Tonga rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Cabo Verde ranks 179th and Tonga ranks 178th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).