Cambodia vs Denmark: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Cambodia
- Denmark
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 186,109 t against 179,520 t in Denmark, a difference of 6,589 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.
Cambodia ranks 43rd and Denmark ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 32,428 t | 117,035 t | 84,607 t | Denmark |
| 1970s | 22,504 t | 102,836 t | 80,332 t | Denmark |
| 1980s | 31,288 t | 110,418 t | 79,130 t | Denmark |
| 1990s | 58,894 t | 142,372 t | 83,478 t | Denmark |
| 2000s | 91,006 t | 175,576 t | 84,571 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 134,796 t | 204,660 t | 69,864 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 175,070 t | 208,796 t | 33,726 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Denmark?
- Cambodia, at 186,109 t against 179,520 t in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Denmark?
- 6,589 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Denmark?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Denmark rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Cambodia ranks 43rd and Denmark ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).