Cambodia vs Iraq: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Cambodia
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 187,317 t against 186,109 t in Cambodia, a difference of 1,208 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Cambodia ranks 40th and Iraq ranks 39th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Iraq in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 32,428 t | 48,678 t | 16,249 t | Iraq |
| 1970s | 22,504 t | 56,162 t | 33,658 t | Iraq |
| 1980s | 31,288 t | 50,237 t | 18,949 t | Iraq |
| 1990s | 58,894 t | 48,680 t | 10,214 t | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 91,006 t | 74,410 t | 16,596 t | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 134,796 t | 173,770 t | 38,975 t | Iraq |
| 2020s | 175,070 t | 190,994 t | 15,924 t | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 187,317 t against 186,109 t in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Iraq?
- 1,208 t, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Iraq?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Iraq rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Cambodia ranks 40th and Iraq ranks 39th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).