Canada vs Czechoslovakia: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 367,089 t against 302,256 t in Canada, a difference of 64,833 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 28th and Czechoslovakia ranks 25th of 186 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 559,679 t | 301,394 t | 258,286 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 615,469 t | 392,485 t | 222,984 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 646,053 t | 442,842 t | 203,211 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 727,842 t | 433,337 t | 294,505 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Canada or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 367,089 t against 302,256 t in Canada as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Canada and Czechoslovakia?
- 64,833 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Canada and Czechoslovakia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 28th and Czechoslovakia ranks 25th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).