Canada vs Oceania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 529,449 t against 302,256 t in Canada, a difference of 227,193 t.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.8 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 28th and Oceania ranks 25th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 6 and Oceania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 559,679 t | 94,920 t | 464,759 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 615,469 t | 102,080 t | 513,390 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 646,053 t | 155,546 t | 490,507 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 749,356 t | 194,359 t | 554,997 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 881,016 t | 238,484 t | 642,532 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 824,665 t | 354,093 t | 470,571 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 404,696 t | 443,570 t | 38,874 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Canada or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 529,449 t against 302,256 t in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Canada and Oceania?
- 227,193 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Oceania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Oceania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 28th and Oceania ranks 25th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).