Canada vs Romania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Romania
How they compare
Canada currently reports 302,256 t against 281,287 t in Romania, a difference of 20,969 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 31st and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 559,679 t | 141,012 t | 418,667 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 615,469 t | 213,327 t | 402,142 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 646,053 t | 267,204 t | 378,848 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 749,356 t | 230,300 t | 519,056 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 881,016 t | 186,712 t | 694,305 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 824,665 t | 260,682 t | 563,982 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 404,696 t | 273,931 t | 130,766 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Canada or Romania?
- Canada, at 302,256 t against 281,287 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Canada and Romania?
- 20,969 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Romania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 31st and Romania ranks 32nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).