Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium

Canada
302,256 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
330,540 t
in 2023
Canada rank
28th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Canada
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 330,540 t against 302,256 t in Canada, a difference of 28,284 t.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 28th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 186 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 559,679 t 48,860 t 510,819 t Canada
1970s 615,469 t 66,656 t 548,813 t Canada
1980s 646,053 t 101,557 t 544,495 t Canada
1990s 749,356 t 112,246 t 637,110 t Canada
2000s 881,016 t 135,520 t 745,496 t Canada
2010s 824,665 t 222,131 t 602,534 t Canada
2020s 404,696 t 313,300 t 91,396 t Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Canada or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 330,540 t against 302,256 t in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
28,284 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
Canada ranks 28th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).