Central African Republic vs Eritrea: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Central African Republic
- Eritrea
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 8,985 t against 8,804 t in Eritrea, a difference of 181 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 121st and Eritrea ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,973 t | 5,301 t | 328.13 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 5,181 t | 6,716 t | 1,535 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 5,387 t | 8,740 t | 3,353 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 7,794 t | 8,802 t | 1,008 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Central African Republic or Eritrea?
- Central African Republic, at 8,985 t against 8,804 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Central African Republic and Eritrea?
- 181 t, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Eritrea rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Central African Republic ranks 121st and Eritrea ranks 122nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).