Chad vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Chad
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chad currently reports 30,604 t against 25,529 t in South Sudan, a difference of 5,075 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 96th and South Sudan ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 29,268 t | 22,731 t | 6,536 t | Chad |
| 2020s | 30,761 t | 23,299 t | 7,461 t | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Chad or South Sudan?
- Chad, at 30,604 t against 25,529 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Chad and South Sudan?
- 5,075 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Chad and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Chad ranks 96th and South Sudan ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).