China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium

China, mainland
6.79 million t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
330,540 t
in 2023
China, mainland rank
3rd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • China, mainland
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 6.79 million t against 330,540 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 6.46 million t.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 20.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, mainland has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 186 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 2.52 million t 48,860 t 2.47 million t China, mainland
1970s 3.29 million t 66,656 t 3.22 million t China, mainland
1980s 4.77 million t 101,557 t 4.67 million t China, mainland
1990s 5.40 million t 112,246 t 5.29 million t China, mainland
2000s 5.08 million t 135,520 t 4.94 million t China, mainland
2010s 5.72 million t 222,131 t 5.50 million t China, mainland
2020s 6.61 million t 313,300 t 6.29 million t China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, China, mainland or United Republic of Tanzania?
China, mainland, at 6.79 million t against 330,540 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania?
6.46 million t, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
China, mainland ranks 3rd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/china-mainland/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/china-mainland/united-republic-of-tanzania/">China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).